<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 344 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344073</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal on the discrepancy in receipts, remitting the matter to the Assessing Officer for further examination. However, the appeal regarding the disallowance of the cost of improvement for capital gains computation was dismissed due to insufficient evidence supporting the claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 05:58:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 344 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344073</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal on the discrepancy in receipts, remitting the matter to the Assessing Officer for further examination. However, the appeal regarding the disallowance of the cost of improvement for capital gains computation was dismissed due to insufficient evidence supporting the claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>