<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 343 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344072</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 14,69,000 on account of unexplained money while upholding the additions of Rs. 14,00,000 and Rs. 10,00,000. The Tribunal stressed the significance of discharging the burden of proof, resulting in the differing outcomes for each issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 05:58:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 343 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344072</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 14,69,000 on account of unexplained money while upholding the additions of Rs. 14,00,000 and Rs. 10,00,000. The Tribunal stressed the significance of discharging the burden of proof, resulting in the differing outcomes for each issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>