<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 340 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344069</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of reassessment proceedings under Sections 147/148, citing misrepresentation by the assessee. Depreciation on &quot;Government Authorizations&quot; and non-compete fees was disallowed, as they were not eligible assets. Non-compete fees were deemed personal rights, not qualifying for depreciation. Goodwill depreciation was permitted, with computation instructions based on asset and liability values.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 05:58:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 340 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344069</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of reassessment proceedings under Sections 147/148, citing misrepresentation by the assessee. Depreciation on &quot;Government Authorizations&quot; and non-compete fees was disallowed, as they were not eligible assets. Non-compete fees were deemed personal rights, not qualifying for depreciation. Goodwill depreciation was permitted, with computation instructions based on asset and liability values.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>