<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 335 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344064</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, reducing the disallowance under Section 14A to Rs. 28,815/- and the disallowance towards administrative expenses to Rs. 25,000/-. The Tribunal emphasized that disallowance under Section 14A requires actual expenditure related to exempt income and that mechanical disallowance should not be made when the assessee has sufficient own funds for investments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 16:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 335 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344064</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, reducing the disallowance under Section 14A to Rs. 28,815/- and the disallowance towards administrative expenses to Rs. 25,000/-. The Tribunal emphasized that disallowance under Section 14A requires actual expenditure related to exempt income and that mechanical disallowance should not be made when the assessee has sufficient own funds for investments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>