https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192618 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the pharmaceutical company Appellant in a refund claim dispute involving duty payment on imported medicines. The Appellant's appeal succeeded as the Tribunal found that the doctrine of unjust enrichment did not apply due to the destruction of goods and absence of transfer of ownership. The impugned order was set aside, and the Appellant was granted the refund with interest, highlighting the equitable application of the doctrine in cases where no undue benefit accrues. en-us Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Jun 2017 05:56:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192618 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the pharmaceutical company Appellant in a refund claim dispute involving duty payment on imported medicines. The Appellant's appeal succeeded as the Tribunal found that the doctrine of unjust enrichment did not apply due to the destruction of goods and absence of transfer of ownership. The impugned order was set aside, and the Appellant was granted the refund with interest, highlighting the equitable application of the doctrine in cases where no undue benefit accrues. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192618