<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1588 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192627</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the issue of expenditure disallowance back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The judgment emphasized the importance of substantiating the actual receipt of services and payments made, particularly in the context of transfer pricing adjustments and the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s jurisdiction in analyzing expenditure under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 05:56:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1588 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192627</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the issue of expenditure disallowance back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The judgment emphasized the importance of substantiating the actual receipt of services and payments made, particularly in the context of transfer pricing adjustments and the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s jurisdiction in analyzing expenditure under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>