https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192590 The court held that each petitioner in the joint petition must seek independent remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution. Emphasizing the importance of individual grievances, the court directed the appropriation of court fees based on each petitioner's claim, rejecting the petitioners' arguments for joint petition or further fee appropriation. The court ordered the appropriation of the deposits towards court fees for each petitioner's individual petition, negating the petitioners' submissions for alternative arrangements. en-us Tue, 29 Jun 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Jun 2017 11:24:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192590 The court held that each petitioner in the joint petition must seek independent remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution. Emphasizing the importance of individual grievances, the court directed the appropriation of court fees based on each petitioner's claim, rejecting the petitioners' arguments for joint petition or further fee appropriation. The court ordered the appropriation of the deposits towards court fees for each petitioner's individual petition, negating the petitioners' submissions for alternative arrangements. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Jun 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192590