https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192589 The Supreme Court upheld re-evaluation of an objective-type competitive examination where the conducting Board corrected defective model answers, deleted wrong questions, and issued a revised merit list, holding that such action was confined to objective questions capable of accurate reassessment and was not arbitrary. It also granted limited equitable protection to innocent appointees who had already undergone training and served for years, finding that immediate ouster would be unjust, but that they could not retain an unfair advantage from the earlier erroneous selection. Their adjustment through fresh appointment in the revised merit list was ordered without back wages, seniority, or other benefits from the original appointment. en-us Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Jun 2017 11:13:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192589 The Supreme Court upheld re-evaluation of an objective-type competitive examination where the conducting Board corrected defective model answers, deleted wrong questions, and issued a revised merit list, holding that such action was confined to objective questions capable of accurate reassessment and was not arbitrary. It also granted limited equitable protection to innocent appointees who had already undergone training and served for years, finding that immediate ouster would be unjust, but that they could not retain an unfair advantage from the earlier erroneous selection. Their adjustment through fresh appointment in the revised merit list was ordered without back wages, seniority, or other benefits from the original appointment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192589