<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 319 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344048</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that their activity of manufacturing Steel Tubular Poles constituted manufacturing under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal found that the process involved in creating the poles resulted in a new product with a distinct identity, distinguishing it from mere assembly or joining of pipes. As a result, the appellant was granted the benefit of exemption, overturning the previous decision that denied them the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 06:30:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 319 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344048</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that their activity of manufacturing Steel Tubular Poles constituted manufacturing under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal found that the process involved in creating the poles resulted in a new product with a distinct identity, distinguishing it from mere assembly or joining of pipes. As a result, the appellant was granted the benefit of exemption, overturning the previous decision that denied them the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>