<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 311 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344040</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned orders and allowing all three appeals with consequential relief. The Tribunal found that the issue was settled in favor of the appellant by legal precedents and deemed the impugned orders unsustainable in law, leading to their overturn.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2017 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 311 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344040</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned orders and allowing all three appeals with consequential relief. The Tribunal found that the issue was settled in favor of the appellant by legal precedents and deemed the impugned orders unsustainable in law, leading to their overturn.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>