<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 310 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344039</link>
    <description>Milk Treat was not classifiable as wafers coated with chocolate or containing chocolate under Tariff Heading 1905 32 11 because that heading applies only where the product contains chocolate, and the tariff scheme and HSN notes distinguish chocolate from white chocolate and from cocoa butter. On the admitted ingredients, the product contained cocoa butter rather than cocoa or chocolate, and cocoa butter is not treated as cocoa for classification purposes. The view that cocoa butter is equivalent to cocoa was rejected, and the product was correctly classified as other wafers under Tariff Heading 1905 32 19 in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 12:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 310 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344039</link>
      <description>Milk Treat was not classifiable as wafers coated with chocolate or containing chocolate under Tariff Heading 1905 32 11 because that heading applies only where the product contains chocolate, and the tariff scheme and HSN notes distinguish chocolate from white chocolate and from cocoa butter. On the admitted ingredients, the product contained cocoa butter rather than cocoa or chocolate, and cocoa butter is not treated as cocoa for classification purposes. The view that cocoa butter is equivalent to cocoa was rejected, and the product was correctly classified as other wafers under Tariff Heading 1905 32 19 in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>