https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344038 The court dismissed the petition challenging various public notices and a tender notice, holding that the measures aimed at reducing port congestion and expediting cargo clearance were in public interest. The court found the actions in line with relevant regulations, emphasizing transparency and equal opportunity for all container freight stations. The petitioners' claims of favoritism and lack of transparency were rejected, with the court ruling that the measures did not violate constitutional rights and prioritized public interest over commercial concerns. en-us Mon, 05 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Jun 2017 06:29:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344038 The court dismissed the petition challenging various public notices and a tender notice, holding that the measures aimed at reducing port congestion and expediting cargo clearance were in public interest. The court found the actions in line with relevant regulations, emphasizing transparency and equal opportunity for all container freight stations. The petitioners' claims of favoritism and lack of transparency were rejected, with the court ruling that the measures did not violate constitutional rights and prioritized public interest over commercial concerns. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 05 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344038