<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 304 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344033</link>
    <description>A fiscal levy on liquor sold through FL II licensees was treated as valid under the governing statutory scheme, and the challenge based on illegality and double taxation failed because the tax was recoverable from consumers through retailers. The presumption of validity attached to the notifications and circulars, and the revised label regime permitting sales tax over and above the maximum retail price was upheld. Retailers remained obliged to collect and deposit the tax, although cases where tax was not actually collected during the period of confusion were left for departmental examination on their own facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 06:29:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 304 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344033</link>
      <description>A fiscal levy on liquor sold through FL II licensees was treated as valid under the governing statutory scheme, and the challenge based on illegality and double taxation failed because the tax was recoverable from consumers through retailers. The presumption of validity attached to the notifications and circulars, and the revised label regime permitting sales tax over and above the maximum retail price was upheld. Retailers remained obliged to collect and deposit the tax, although cases where tax was not actually collected during the period of confusion were left for departmental examination on their own facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>