<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 297 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344026</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order for Assessment Year 2009-10. It emphasized the importance of ownership in property transactions, directing the AO to recalculate capital gains by considering the ownership status and deducting the cost of the plot from the property value. The Tribunal overturned the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision, highlighting the need for accurate computation of capital gains based on ownership details.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 297 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344026</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order for Assessment Year 2009-10. It emphasized the importance of ownership in property transactions, directing the AO to recalculate capital gains by considering the ownership status and deducting the cost of the plot from the property value. The Tribunal overturned the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision, highlighting the need for accurate computation of capital gains based on ownership details.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>