https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192585 The Court allowed the restoration of the Tax Appeal before CESTAT, emphasizing the petitioner's readiness to fulfill the pre-deposit requirement despite a significant delay. The Court considered past leniency in such cases where the dismissal was solely due to the failure to make a pre-deposit. The petitioner was given until 15-1-2016 to fulfill the pre-deposit condition for the appeal's restoration. en-us Tue, 22 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Jun 2017 06:16:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192585 The Court allowed the restoration of the Tax Appeal before CESTAT, emphasizing the petitioner's readiness to fulfill the pre-deposit requirement despite a significant delay. The Court considered past leniency in such cases where the dismissal was solely due to the failure to make a pre-deposit. The petitioner was given until 15-1-2016 to fulfill the pre-deposit condition for the appeal's restoration. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 22 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192585