<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1937 (3) TMI 16 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192568</link>
    <description>An Official Receiver, acting in a representative capacity over an insolvent estate, may fall within the word &quot;person&quot; in Order 33, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure and therefore can seek to sue as a pauper if the rule&#039;s conditions are satisfied. The provision is not confined to natural persons suing in a personal capacity; its language and purpose also accommodate fiduciaries such as executors, administrators, trustees, and similar legal representatives. The relevant pauper test applies to the representative capacity in which the suit is brought, rather than to personal ownership alone. The matter was remitted to the lower court to determine whether the statutory conditions were met.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 1937 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2017 15:37:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1937 (3) TMI 16 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192568</link>
      <description>An Official Receiver, acting in a representative capacity over an insolvent estate, may fall within the word &quot;person&quot; in Order 33, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure and therefore can seek to sue as a pauper if the rule&#039;s conditions are satisfied. The provision is not confined to natural persons suing in a personal capacity; its language and purpose also accommodate fiduciaries such as executors, administrators, trustees, and similar legal representatives. The relevant pauper test applies to the representative capacity in which the suit is brought, rather than to personal ownership alone. The matter was remitted to the lower court to determine whether the statutory conditions were met.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 1937 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>