https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192566 Company Standing Orders framed under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 were held to cover all persons employed in the specified departments, not only those issued tickets. References to names and ticket numbers in the muster were treated as conditional on tickets existing, not as a precondition to employee status. The distinction between "employees" and "workmen" showed that every employee was not necessarily a workman, but the respondent still fell within the covered employee class. On that basis, the employer could act under Standing Order 16(1), and no separate misconduct penalty under Standing Order 18 was required. The termination was therefore valid. en-us Fri, 11 Apr 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Jun 2017 15:23:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192566 Company Standing Orders framed under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 were held to cover all persons employed in the specified departments, not only those issued tickets. References to names and ticket numbers in the muster were treated as conditional on tickets existing, not as a precondition to employee status. The distinction between "employees" and "workmen" showed that every employee was not necessarily a workman, but the respondent still fell within the covered employee class. On that basis, the employer could act under Standing Order 16(1), and no separate misconduct penalty under Standing Order 18 was required. The termination was therefore valid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Apr 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192566