<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1917 (11) TMI 1 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192565</link>
    <description>Order XXXIII of the CPC applies to companies: a company qualifies as a &quot;pauper&quot; if it cannot pay court fees and may seek leave to sue in forma pauperis. The requirement of personal presentation does not bar corporate plaintiffs because law permits representative litigation (for example by an official liquidator acting under company law and procedural rules). The liquidator&#039;s personal finances are irrelevant; the determinative fact is the company&#039;s inability to pay. Payment of statutory remuneration or commission to the liquidator does not amount to an agreement with a third party that disqualifies the company from proceeding in forma pauperis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 1917 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2017 15:15:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1917 (11) TMI 1 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192565</link>
      <description>Order XXXIII of the CPC applies to companies: a company qualifies as a &quot;pauper&quot; if it cannot pay court fees and may seek leave to sue in forma pauperis. The requirement of personal presentation does not bar corporate plaintiffs because law permits representative litigation (for example by an official liquidator acting under company law and procedural rules). The liquidator&#039;s personal finances are irrelevant; the determinative fact is the company&#039;s inability to pay. Payment of statutory remuneration or commission to the liquidator does not amount to an agreement with a third party that disqualifies the company from proceeding in forma pauperis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 1917 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>