<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (4) TMI 77 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192563</link>
    <description>Initial depreciation on a business asset is subject to proportionate restriction where the asset is not wholly used for business purposes. Because the car was used partly for business and partly for private use, the full allowance was unavailable and had to be limited to the fair proportion otherwise allowable under the controlling provision. The depreciation claim was therefore restricted, and the assessee could not recover the entire amount claimed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2017 15:05:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (4) TMI 77 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192563</link>
      <description>Initial depreciation on a business asset is subject to proportionate restriction where the asset is not wholly used for business purposes. Because the car was used partly for business and partly for private use, the full allowance was unavailable and had to be limited to the fair proportion otherwise allowable under the controlling provision. The depreciation claim was therefore restricted, and the assessee could not recover the entire amount claimed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>