<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (1) TMI 442 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192561</link>
    <description>A valid industrial award, once published and enforceable, continued to bind the successor Municipal Corporation after municipal merger and could not be displaced by a transfer notification or local non obstante clause. The challenge based on jurisdiction, non-joinder and alleged collusion failed because the Tribunal had jurisdiction, the corporation was not a necessary party to the original reference, and the collusion plea lacked concrete support. The workmen were also entitled to interest on delayed wages and monetary benefits on equitable principles, with the Court directing a reduced rate of 15% per annum until payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2017 14:52:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (1) TMI 442 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192561</link>
      <description>A valid industrial award, once published and enforceable, continued to bind the successor Municipal Corporation after municipal merger and could not be displaced by a transfer notification or local non obstante clause. The challenge based on jurisdiction, non-joinder and alleged collusion failed because the Tribunal had jurisdiction, the corporation was not a necessary party to the original reference, and the collusion plea lacked concrete support. The workmen were also entitled to interest on delayed wages and monetary benefits on equitable principles, with the Court directing a reduced rate of 15% per annum until payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>