<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 820 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192557</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the agreement in question constituted an assignment of rights rather than a contract under Section 194C. Consequently, the demands raised by the Assessing Officer were not upheld. Appeal No. 717/PN/2011 was dismissed as infructuous, while Appeals 1888, 1889, 1890, and 1891/PN/2012 were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2017 12:18:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 820 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192557</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the agreement in question constituted an assignment of rights rather than a contract under Section 194C. Consequently, the demands raised by the Assessing Officer were not upheld. Appeal No. 717/PN/2011 was dismissed as infructuous, while Appeals 1888, 1889, 1890, and 1891/PN/2012 were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>