<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 268 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343997</link>
    <description>The judge ruled in favor of the appellant for all services, finding them directly or indirectly related to production or overall business activity, making them admissible input services for CENVAT Credit. The impugned order was modified, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2017 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 268 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343997</link>
      <description>The judge ruled in favor of the appellant for all services, finding them directly or indirectly related to production or overall business activity, making them admissible input services for CENVAT Credit. The impugned order was modified, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>