https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343981 Regular bail under the NDPS Act was refused where the alleged recovery involved a large quantity of heroin and the petitioner's Section 67 statement was treated as prima facie indicating involvement. The Court applied the restrictive bail conditions under Section 37 and found no reasonable ground to believe that the petitioner was not involved in the offence or that he would not commit an offence while on bail. The plea of juvenility had not yet been determined, but that did not displace the NDPS bail constraints on the material then before the Court. Bail was declined and the petition dismissed. en-us Tue, 23 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Jun 2017 07:21:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343981 Regular bail under the NDPS Act was refused where the alleged recovery involved a large quantity of heroin and the petitioner's Section 67 statement was treated as prima facie indicating involvement. The Court applied the restrictive bail conditions under Section 37 and found no reasonable ground to believe that the petitioner was not involved in the offence or that he would not commit an offence while on bail. The plea of juvenility had not yet been determined, but that did not displace the NDPS bail constraints on the material then before the Court. Bail was declined and the petition dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343981