https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343959 The tribunal allowed the appeal in part, directing the Assessing Officer to restrict the addition to 5% of the purchases. The tribunal found that the assessee had demonstrated the sales of the alleged bogus purchases, shifting the burden of proof to the AO. The decision served the ends of justice, with the tribunal pronouncing the order on 16/05/2017. en-us Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Jun 2017 07:19:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343959 The tribunal allowed the appeal in part, directing the Assessing Officer to restrict the addition to 5% of the purchases. The tribunal found that the assessee had demonstrated the sales of the alleged bogus purchases, shifting the burden of proof to the AO. The decision served the ends of justice, with the tribunal pronouncing the order on 16/05/2017. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343959