<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1107 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192551</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the matter back to the adjudicating authority for denovo consideration. It directed re-testing of seized goods, verification of import details from department records, and completion of adjudication proceedings within three months, emphasizing cooperation between the appellants and the department for an expeditious resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2017 06:48:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1107 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192551</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the matter back to the adjudicating authority for denovo consideration. It directed re-testing of seized goods, verification of import details from department records, and completion of adjudication proceedings within three months, emphasizing cooperation between the appellants and the department for an expeditious resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>