<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1401 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192554</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant/assessee in an appeal against the Tribunal&#039;s order for the assessment year 2008-2009. The Court held that Explanation 2 to Section 132B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, inserted by the Finance Act, 2013, is prospective from 01.06.2013 based on previous judgments. As a result, the Court found the explanation inapplicable to the appellant&#039;s case, leading to the setting aside of the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2017 06:48:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1401 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192554</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant/assessee in an appeal against the Tribunal&#039;s order for the assessment year 2008-2009. The Court held that Explanation 2 to Section 132B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, inserted by the Finance Act, 2013, is prospective from 01.06.2013 based on previous judgments. As a result, the Court found the explanation inapplicable to the appellant&#039;s case, leading to the setting aside of the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>