https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192544 Prior possession was treated as an enforceable title against everyone except the true owner, so a later trespasser could not defeat recovery by relying on an alleged intervening entry by the true owner. A subsequent title acquired after suit was not entertained because it had not been pleaded or tried and its introduction would prejudice the opposite party. Mesne profits and compensation for waste were held to depend on judicial assessment of the evidence, not on the rough estimate in the plaint, and relief could exceed that estimate where wrongful possession and loss to the property were proved. en-us Thu, 23 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Jun 2017 16:56:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192544 Prior possession was treated as an enforceable title against everyone except the true owner, so a later trespasser could not defeat recovery by relying on an alleged intervening entry by the true owner. A subsequent title acquired after suit was not entertained because it had not been pleaded or tried and its introduction would prejudice the opposite party. Mesne profits and compensation for waste were held to depend on judicial assessment of the evidence, not on the rough estimate in the plaint, and relief could exceed that estimate where wrongful possession and loss to the property were proved. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192544