<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 222 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343951</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax under Notification No. 41/2007-ST, as amended, was examined for export-related services including terminal handling, CHA, banking, foreign exchange and GTA services. Claims for the period before 07.12.2008 were not admissible where drawback had been claimed under the then-existing condition, while services used within the port area for export activity were treated as eligible after the amendment. Service tax paid through cenvat credit under reverse charge was also recognised as capable of refund. For banking charges, GTA and foreign exchange-related payments, entitlement depended on documentary proof linking the service, tax payment and export shipments, so the matter was remanded for fresh verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 07:13:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 222 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343951</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax under Notification No. 41/2007-ST, as amended, was examined for export-related services including terminal handling, CHA, banking, foreign exchange and GTA services. Claims for the period before 07.12.2008 were not admissible where drawback had been claimed under the then-existing condition, while services used within the port area for export activity were treated as eligible after the amendment. Service tax paid through cenvat credit under reverse charge was also recognised as capable of refund. For banking charges, GTA and foreign exchange-related payments, entitlement depended on documentary proof linking the service, tax payment and export shipments, so the matter was remanded for fresh verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>