<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 221 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343950</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside penalties imposed under Section 77 and Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, in a case involving Business Auxiliary Services provided by the appellants. The tribunal found that the penalties lacked justification as there was no basis for the penalty under Section 77 and insufficient evidence of suppression under Section 78. Considering the appellant&#039;s compliance with income tax regulations and the recent removal of service tax exemption on commission agent services, their belief was deemed reasonable. The appeal was allowed, and the revision order imposing penalties was deemed unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 221 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343950</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside penalties imposed under Section 77 and Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, in a case involving Business Auxiliary Services provided by the appellants. The tribunal found that the penalties lacked justification as there was no basis for the penalty under Section 77 and insufficient evidence of suppression under Section 78. Considering the appellant&#039;s compliance with income tax regulations and the recent removal of service tax exemption on commission agent services, their belief was deemed reasonable. The appeal was allowed, and the revision order imposing penalties was deemed unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>