<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 208 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343937</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the appellants unknowingly procured non-duty paid raw coal but lacked intent to evade duties. While confiscation was upheld, penalties were deemed unwarranted due to the appellants&#039; lack of knowledge. The Tribunal directed the Adjudicating Authority to offer the option of fines under Section 34 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, in place of confiscation. Penalties were set aside, and the appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 07:12:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 208 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343937</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the appellants unknowingly procured non-duty paid raw coal but lacked intent to evade duties. While confiscation was upheld, penalties were deemed unwarranted due to the appellants&#039; lack of knowledge. The Tribunal directed the Adjudicating Authority to offer the option of fines under Section 34 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, in place of confiscation. Penalties were set aside, and the appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>