<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 206 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343935</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal, allowing the respondent to utilize Additional Excise Duty (AED) credit accrued before 1.3.2003 for payment of CENVAT duty. The Tribunal held that as the disputed credit was availed before 1.3.2003, the subsequent Circular restricting such utilization did not apply. The decision clarified that the respondent could use the AED credit in accordance with the rules and Circulars in place at the time of credit accrual.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 07:12:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 206 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343935</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal, allowing the respondent to utilize Additional Excise Duty (AED) credit accrued before 1.3.2003 for payment of CENVAT duty. The Tribunal held that as the disputed credit was availed before 1.3.2003, the subsequent Circular restricting such utilization did not apply. The decision clarified that the respondent could use the AED credit in accordance with the rules and Circulars in place at the time of credit accrual.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>