https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343925 The appeals were filed against the order-in-original dated 29th July 2005 of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane-II, concerning imports by an Export Oriented Unit (EOU). Allegations of conspiracy to include a new product in the Letter of Permission (LoP) for duty evasion were made. The judgment upheld the confiscation of imported goods, imposition of fines, and penalties on involved parties for non-compliance with EOU regulations and duty liabilities. The discrepancy between permitted products and cleared goods led to the rejection of appeals, emphasizing adherence to Foreign Trade Policy. en-us Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Nov 2017 14:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343925 The appeals were filed against the order-in-original dated 29th July 2005 of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane-II, concerning imports by an Export Oriented Unit (EOU). Allegations of conspiracy to include a new product in the Letter of Permission (LoP) for duty evasion were made. The judgment upheld the confiscation of imported goods, imposition of fines, and penalties on involved parties for non-compliance with EOU regulations and duty liabilities. The discrepancy between permitted products and cleared goods led to the rejection of appeals, emphasizing adherence to Foreign Trade Policy. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343925