https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343924 The appeal challenging the order-in-original under sections 111 and 113 of the Customs Act, 1962, involving confiscation of goods, imposition of duties and penalties, and alleged substitution of diamonds, was allowed. The judgment highlighted procedural lapses, discrepancies in the Export Processing Zone scheme, and lack of verification from departmental records. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for a fresh hearing to ensure proper verification and compliance with the remand order. en-us Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Jun 2017 07:12:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343924 The appeal challenging the order-in-original under sections 111 and 113 of the Customs Act, 1962, involving confiscation of goods, imposition of duties and penalties, and alleged substitution of diamonds, was allowed. The judgment highlighted procedural lapses, discrepancies in the Export Processing Zone scheme, and lack of verification from departmental records. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for a fresh hearing to ensure proper verification and compliance with the remand order. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343924