https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343920 The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of differential duty, redemption fine, and personal penalty imposed for misdeclaration of goods in terms of quantity and value. The appellant's request for remand for a fresh decision due to lack of detailed discussion in the impugned order was rejected. The Tribunal found the demand of the differential duty to be based on correct invoices submitted by the importer, supporting the sustained undervaluation claim. The appellant was required to pre-deposit the confirmed duty demands on both live and earlier Bills of Entry, with a stay granted for other amounts demanded upon compliance. en-us Tue, 02 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Jun 2017 07:11:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343920 The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of differential duty, redemption fine, and personal penalty imposed for misdeclaration of goods in terms of quantity and value. The appellant's request for remand for a fresh decision due to lack of detailed discussion in the impugned order was rejected. The Tribunal found the demand of the differential duty to be based on correct invoices submitted by the importer, supporting the sustained undervaluation claim. The appellant was required to pre-deposit the confirmed duty demands on both live and earlier Bills of Entry, with a stay granted for other amounts demanded upon compliance. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 02 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343920