<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 190 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343919</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the customs authorities, upholding the confiscation order due to the presence of non-Basmati rice in the export consignment, non-compliance with the Foreign Trade Policy conditions, and the lack of objection to the sampling procedure during the proceedings. The judgment emphasizes the significance of adhering strictly to export regulations and policies to prevent confiscation of goods and penalties under the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 18:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 190 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343919</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the customs authorities, upholding the confiscation order due to the presence of non-Basmati rice in the export consignment, non-compliance with the Foreign Trade Policy conditions, and the lack of objection to the sampling procedure during the proceedings. The judgment emphasizes the significance of adhering strictly to export regulations and policies to prevent confiscation of goods and penalties under the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>