https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343917 The tribunal upheld the petitioner's removal as a director for absenteeism and lack of response to inquiries. Allegations of oppression and mismanagement were dismissed due to insufficient evidence. The tribunal emphasized the distinction between directorial complaints and shareholder oppression, directing fair valuation for the petitioner's exit within three months. The petition was resolved without costs. en-us Thu, 20 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Jun 2017 07:11:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343917 The tribunal upheld the petitioner's removal as a director for absenteeism and lack of response to inquiries. Allegations of oppression and mismanagement were dismissed due to insufficient evidence. The tribunal emphasized the distinction between directorial complaints and shareholder oppression, directing fair valuation for the petitioner's exit within three months. The petition was resolved without costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 20 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343917