<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 187 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343916</link>
    <description>A section 9 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code petition cannot be maintained on interest alone once the principal operational debt has been discharged. The Tribunal noted that operational debt under section 5(21) does not treat interest in the same manner as financial debt, and the original invoices contained no agreed interest clause. Later invoices adding interest were unilateral and not shown to have been accepted by the respondent, and no contractual or statutory basis for the claimed rate was established. In these circumstances, the remaining interest dispute did not justify admission of the insolvency petition, which was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 187 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343916</link>
      <description>A section 9 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code petition cannot be maintained on interest alone once the principal operational debt has been discharged. The Tribunal noted that operational debt under section 5(21) does not treat interest in the same manner as financial debt, and the original invoices contained no agreed interest clause. Later invoices adding interest were unilateral and not shown to have been accepted by the respondent, and no contractual or statutory basis for the claimed rate was established. In these circumstances, the remaining interest dispute did not justify admission of the insolvency petition, which was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>