<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (5) TMI 18 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8048</link>
    <description>The right of appeal under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 was construed broadly enough to cover a denial of liability in a particular assessment proceeding, not merely a claim that the Act had no application at all. On that basis, an assessee&#039;s appeal challenging assessment as a partner was maintainable because the second proviso to section 30(1) did not apply where the firm&#039;s income had not been assessed under the relevant partnership provisions. The material on record, including the partnership deed, supplementary deed, and the assessee&#039;s own section 26A applications signed as a partner, was sufficient to support the finding that he had been inducted as a partner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (5) TMI 18 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8048</link>
      <description>The right of appeal under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 was construed broadly enough to cover a denial of liability in a particular assessment proceeding, not merely a claim that the Act had no application at all. On that basis, an assessee&#039;s appeal challenging assessment as a partner was maintainable because the second proviso to section 30(1) did not apply where the firm&#039;s income had not been assessed under the relevant partnership provisions. The material on record, including the partnership deed, supplementary deed, and the assessee&#039;s own section 26A applications signed as a partner, was sufficient to support the finding that he had been inducted as a partner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>