<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 168 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343897</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, ruling that they were entitled to exemption under Sections 10(10)(i) and 10(10AA)(i) for arrears of gratuity and leave encashment. The impugned order was set aside, and the Assessing Officer was directed to allow the claims of the assessee. Consequently, the additions made were deleted, and the appeals of the assessees were allowed. The Tribunal also addressed the issue of interest charged under Section 234B in accordance with its findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2017 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 168 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343897</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, ruling that they were entitled to exemption under Sections 10(10)(i) and 10(10AA)(i) for arrears of gratuity and leave encashment. The impugned order was set aside, and the Assessing Officer was directed to allow the claims of the assessee. Consequently, the additions made were deleted, and the appeals of the assessees were allowed. The Tribunal also addressed the issue of interest charged under Section 234B in accordance with its findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>