https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192533 Where connected suits are tried on common pleadings, issues and a common judgment, an unchallenged adverse decree attains finality and may operate as res judicata in the related appeal. The Court applied that principle to bar reopening of the same title issue because the tenants had not appealed against all decrees arising from the common adjudication. It also reaffirmed tenant's estoppel: during the tenancy, a tenant cannot deny the landlord's title at its inception or challenge the transfer of the demised property where the pleadings and statutory bar foreclose that defence. On that basis, the tenants' challenge to title and transfer was held barred. en-us Thu, 09 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Jun 2017 07:08:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192533 Where connected suits are tried on common pleadings, issues and a common judgment, an unchallenged adverse decree attains finality and may operate as res judicata in the related appeal. The Court applied that principle to bar reopening of the same title issue because the tenants had not appealed against all decrees arising from the common adjudication. It also reaffirmed tenant's estoppel: during the tenancy, a tenant cannot deny the landlord's title at its inception or challenge the transfer of the demised property where the pleadings and statutory bar foreclose that defence. On that basis, the tenants' challenge to title and transfer was held barred. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 09 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192533