https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192528 A connected money suit decided by separate judgment and decree could operate as res judicata in a later partition appeal because the statutory conditions in Section 11 CPC were satisfied. The Court treated the earlier decision as a former suit with finality, and held that the fact the two matters were heard together did not prevent the earlier decree from barring the subsequent appeal. It also held that, in a partition dispute where parties claim a joint property right in common, Explanation VI to Section 11 applies and binds those interested in that shared claim. The preliminary objection succeeded and the appeal was barred. en-us Wed, 19 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Jun 2017 18:13:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192528 A connected money suit decided by separate judgment and decree could operate as res judicata in a later partition appeal because the statutory conditions in Section 11 CPC were satisfied. The Court treated the earlier decision as a former suit with finality, and held that the fact the two matters were heard together did not prevent the earlier decree from barring the subsequent appeal. It also held that, in a partition dispute where parties claim a joint property right in common, Explanation VI to Section 11 applies and binds those interested in that shared claim. The preliminary objection succeeded and the appeal was barred. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192528