https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192526 The Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 was construed to permit the State Government to authorise a Regional Transport Officer, as an officer subordinate to the Transport Commissioner, to exercise specified functions of the State Transport Authority under Sections 48-A, 51-A and 56-A. The absence of a separate notice of revision was held not to vitiate the proceedings, because the matter was treated as a public interest route-and-permit dispute rather than a private lis and the affected parties had already had an opportunity at the original notice stage. The Government's revisional power under Section 64-A was also upheld as not being excluded merely because an appeal existed in other situations. en-us Thu, 20 Nov 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:25:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192526 The Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 was construed to permit the State Government to authorise a Regional Transport Officer, as an officer subordinate to the Transport Commissioner, to exercise specified functions of the State Transport Authority under Sections 48-A, 51-A and 56-A. The absence of a separate notice of revision was held not to vitiate the proceedings, because the matter was treated as a public interest route-and-permit dispute rather than a private lis and the affected parties had already had an opportunity at the original notice stage. The Government's revisional power under Section 64-A was also upheld as not being excluded merely because an appeal existed in other situations. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 20 Nov 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192526