https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192524 The commentary examines whether Rule 11(2) of the Bombay Borough Municipalities Election Rules, 1950, was consistent with Section 11A(2) of the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act so as to allow a person enrolled in one ward's voters list to contest from another ward within the same municipal borough. It states that the majority construed the phrase "any ward of the municipal borough" broadly, treated the rule as aligned with the statutory election scheme, and accepted it as contemporaneous legislative exposition. The earlier contrary view was overruled, while the dissent would have treated the rule as ultra vires. en-us Fri, 13 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Jun 2017 16:54:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192524 The commentary examines whether Rule 11(2) of the Bombay Borough Municipalities Election Rules, 1950, was consistent with Section 11A(2) of the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act so as to allow a person enrolled in one ward's voters list to contest from another ward within the same municipal borough. It states that the majority construed the phrase "any ward of the municipal borough" broadly, treated the rule as aligned with the statutory election scheme, and accepted it as contemporaneous legislative exposition. The earlier contrary view was overruled, while the dissent would have treated the rule as ultra vires. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192524