<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1927 (6) TMI 1 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192521</link>
    <description>A contract is not invalid merely because the vendor was aged or infirm if the evidence shows that the vendor understood the nature and consequences of the transaction and acted with sufficient awareness. Weakness of intellect, without proof of incapacity, unfair advantage, or absence of independent advice, is insufficient to avoid the bargain. An agreement is also sufficiently certain where the price is fixed by an ascertainable method and the law can supply ordinary sale terms. Later offers of a higher price do not by themselves establish hardship or defeat specific performance. The bargain remains enforceable unless real unfairness or legally relevant hardship is proved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 1927 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2017 16:46:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1927 (6) TMI 1 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192521</link>
      <description>A contract is not invalid merely because the vendor was aged or infirm if the evidence shows that the vendor understood the nature and consequences of the transaction and acted with sufficient awareness. Weakness of intellect, without proof of incapacity, unfair advantage, or absence of independent advice, is insufficient to avoid the bargain. An agreement is also sufficiently certain where the price is fixed by an ascertainable method and the law can supply ordinary sale terms. Later offers of a higher price do not by themselves establish hardship or defeat specific performance. The bargain remains enforceable unless real unfairness or legally relevant hardship is proved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 1927 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>