<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (5) TMI 127 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192517</link>
    <description>Where the record contains sufficient material, an appellate authority should decide whether the assessee is an importer or purchaser rather than remand for fresh enquiry. The agreement&#039;s substance established a buyer-seller relationship: goods were purchased from the company&#039;s depots, payment was made against bills, and the company&#039;s liability ended on delivery. The company, which moved its own goods into the State and made the first sale, was therefore the importer, not the assessee. Sales were intra-State because goods reached and came to rest at the depots before sale; inter-State movement must be occasioned by or incidental to the sale contract.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2017 16:06:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=470901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (5) TMI 127 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192517</link>
      <description>Where the record contains sufficient material, an appellate authority should decide whether the assessee is an importer or purchaser rather than remand for fresh enquiry. The agreement&#039;s substance established a buyer-seller relationship: goods were purchased from the company&#039;s depots, payment was made against bills, and the company&#039;s liability ended on delivery. The company, which moved its own goods into the State and made the first sale, was therefore the importer, not the assessee. Sales were intra-State because goods reached and came to rest at the depots before sale; inter-State movement must be occasioned by or incidental to the sale contract.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>