https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192506 A subsequent transferee who takes immovable property with notice of a prior enforceable contract holds it subject to that earlier obligation, so possession cannot become adverse merely by asserting title under the later transfer. On that footing, the prior agreement-holders could enforce specific performance against the later transferees, and the mortgagee-purchasers' possession did not bar redemption by limitation. The later conveyance and the omission in execution to join the mortgagee as a conveying party did not alter the underlying rights already determined. The appeal failed, and the decree in favour of the respondents was sustained with costs. en-us Fri, 14 Oct 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Jun 2017 14:29:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192506 A subsequent transferee who takes immovable property with notice of a prior enforceable contract holds it subject to that earlier obligation, so possession cannot become adverse merely by asserting title under the later transfer. On that footing, the prior agreement-holders could enforce specific performance against the later transferees, and the mortgagee-purchasers' possession did not bar redemption by limitation. The later conveyance and the omission in execution to join the mortgagee as a conveying party did not alter the underlying rights already determined. The appeal failed, and the decree in favour of the respondents was sustained with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Oct 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192506