https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192502 Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to discovery of new matter, mistake, or an error apparent on the face of the record, and it cannot be used to reappreciate evidence or sit in appeal over a final decision. An apparent error must be self-evident and not depend on lengthy reasoning or competing views. Where the High Court's earlier ruling on partibility of the disputed property had attained finality, reconsideration of title, possession, and the effect of sale deeds through review amounted to appellate re-examination. The review judgment, and the consequential dismissal of the second appeal on the disputed plot, were therefore unsustainable. en-us Wed, 16 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Jun 2017 13:08:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192502 Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to discovery of new matter, mistake, or an error apparent on the face of the record, and it cannot be used to reappreciate evidence or sit in appeal over a final decision. An apparent error must be self-evident and not depend on lengthy reasoning or competing views. Where the High Court's earlier ruling on partibility of the disputed property had attained finality, reconsideration of title, possession, and the effect of sale deeds through review amounted to appellate re-examination. The review judgment, and the consequential dismissal of the second appeal on the disputed plot, were therefore unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192502