https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192501 A right to obtain reconveyance of immovable property was treated as an assignable property right, enforceable by the assignee unless the agreement clearly excluded transferability or a valid legal bar applied. The restrictive language in the reconveyance document was read as preserving the vendor's and heirs' rights, not as creating a purely personal and non-assignable obligation. Allegations of fraud were rejected, and the leaseback arrangement and rent arrears did not defeat assignment. Section 7(1) of Madras Act 1 of 1955 was held not to bar enforcement by a third-party assignee, so the reconveyance claim remained specifically enforceable. en-us Fri, 15 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Jun 2017 13:01:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192501 A right to obtain reconveyance of immovable property was treated as an assignable property right, enforceable by the assignee unless the agreement clearly excluded transferability or a valid legal bar applied. The restrictive language in the reconveyance document was read as preserving the vendor's and heirs' rights, not as creating a purely personal and non-assignable obligation. Allegations of fraud were rejected, and the leaseback arrangement and rent arrears did not defeat assignment. Section 7(1) of Madras Act 1 of 1955 was held not to bar enforcement by a third-party assignee, so the reconveyance claim remained specifically enforceable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192501