https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192494 A proceeding initially filed before the Certifying Officer lacked jurisdiction can still be validly decided once jurisdiction is later acquired, because the application is tested at the time of certification. On the facts stated, the officer had acquired jurisdiction before the certification order, so the certification was not void. The earlier State-law notification also could not be preserved under the general savings provision after repeal and re-enactment, because the new statutory scheme did not continue to apply to the Bhilai Steel Industry. The appellate order of the Industrial Court was set aside and the matter remitted for consideration of the remaining objections on merits. en-us Fri, 08 Nov 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Jun 2017 10:30:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192494 A proceeding initially filed before the Certifying Officer lacked jurisdiction can still be validly decided once jurisdiction is later acquired, because the application is tested at the time of certification. On the facts stated, the officer had acquired jurisdiction before the certification order, so the certification was not void. The earlier State-law notification also could not be preserved under the general savings provision after repeal and re-enactment, because the new statutory scheme did not continue to apply to the Bhilai Steel Industry. The appellate order of the Industrial Court was set aside and the matter remitted for consideration of the remaining objections on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Nov 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192494