https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192489 The writ petition was dismissed because the issue raised was no longer res integra and stood covered by an earlier Division Bench decision. The Court treated that prior ruling as binding precedent, noted that the controversy had already been authoritatively decided in M/s Dundlod Shikshan Sansthan v. Union of India, and applied that decision to the present petition. As a result, the Court found no scope to entertain the challenge and disposed of the writ petition in terms of the earlier judgment. en-us Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Jun 2017 09:54:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192489 The writ petition was dismissed because the issue raised was no longer res integra and stood covered by an earlier Division Bench decision. The Court treated that prior ruling as binding precedent, noted that the controversy had already been authoritatively decided in M/s Dundlod Shikshan Sansthan v. Union of India, and applied that decision to the present petition. As a result, the Court found no scope to entertain the challenge and disposed of the writ petition in terms of the earlier judgment. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192489